<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
	<channel>
		<title>Surabaya</title>
		<link>http://megakeramik.heavenforum.com/surabaya-f10/-t1.htm</link>
		<description></description>
		<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Dec 2008 09:11:44 GMT</lastBuildDate>
		<ttl>10</ttl>
		
		<item>
			<title>jawabannnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnn</title>
			<link>http://megakeramik.heavenforum.com/surabaya-f10/jawabannnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnn-t11.htm</link>
			<dc:creator>Admin</dc:creator>
			<description>slide 1

Alternative 1 produces Rp 30 millions in one year and another Rp 60 millions a year later. 



Alternative 2 produces Rp 92 millions in one year. 

	

	Which alternative is more viable if the discount rate is 9% if the investment in alternative 1 is Rp 70 millions and alternative 2 is Rp 72 millions?

	(assuming this investment is paid at the start of the project)





slide 2

(if part of the capital investment was to be paid later then it needs to be discounted to the present  ...</description>
			<category>Surabaya</category>
			<pubDate>Fri, 19 Dec 2008 09:11:44 GMT</pubDate>
			<comments>http://megakeramik.heavenforum.com/surabaya-f10/jawabannnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnn-t11.htm#28</comments>
			<guid>http://megakeramik.heavenforum.com/surabaya-f10/jawabannnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnn-t11.htm</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>